Village at Stamford formerly Archstone Stamford
AVERAGE RATING
< | >
Good Downtown Location
From: NursyNurseDate posted: 4/12/2009
Years at this apartment: 2008 - 2009
1 response
Not bad since I didn't have to pay for my stay. I was housed there by my company. If I had to pay for them I would've moved. Not enough storage/closet/cabinet space. Carpet was old and cheap. Had a convenient business center and work-out center. Office staff was outstanding. It's called the Village something now. It was bought by another corporation. Never had any maintenance or management problems. No pool or jacuzzi. Not that I'd use it but just putting it out there. Location was the best. Minutes to walk to restaurants, theatres and bars.
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
I'm the author!
Lived here?
User Responses |
|
| From: Anonymous | Date: 04/29/2009 |
|
Agreed! I had lived there seasonally this year and noticed a HUGE change since Archstone owned the property and plan on going back each year for my shorter term lease.
|
|
Free estimates on moving trucks
Find apartment share/roommates
Up to: Village at Stamford (formerly Archstone Stamford)
Stamford apartments
Disclaimer: No attempt has been made to verify or assure the accuracy of the claims made by the author of this opinion or responses. You must judge the truthfulness of any review and accept responsibility for your use of this information.




