DO NOT BE SURPRISED IF A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT IS FILED AGAINST THIS MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND GOES FORTH. I LIVED IN THIS COMMUNITY FOR A YEAR, MOVED OUT, NEGLECTED TO DO A WALK THRU INSPECTION AND AM NOW BEING SUED FOR AN EXCESS OF 2,000.00.

UPON MOVING OUT, I RECEIVED NOTIFICATION FROM THE MANAGEMENT THAT I OWED A SUM OF MONEY FOR DAMAGES WHICH WAS UNTRUE. IRONICALLY, A CO-WORKER OF MINE HAD RECEIVED THE EXACT SAME ITEMIZATION, WITH THE EXACT SPECIFICATIONS OF DAMAGES AS IT RELATED TO MINE, WHICH ALSO, WAS UNTRUE IN HIS CASE AND TOO SPECIFIC TO BE COINCIDENTAL. I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT THIS MANAGEMENT COMPANY IS A PREDATOR AND I WILL ESTABLISH THIS ON MY DAY IN COURT.

AS A RESULT OF MY MISSING THE INITIAL COURT DATE REGARDING THIS MATTER, FOR WHICH I WAS ONLY GIVEN 12 DAYS NOTICE BEFORE I WAS TO APPEAR IN COURT, A LIEN WAS PLACED ON MY BANK ACCOUNT ILLEGALLY. THE LAW STATES THAT YOU HAVE 35 DAYS TO DISPUTE THE DEBT FROM THE DATE OF CONTACT. THEIR ATTORNEYS PLACED A LIEN ON MY BANK ACCOUNT WITHIN THOSE DATE PARAMETERS AND OUTSIDE OF THE CONFINES OF THE LAW. I HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH THEIR ATTY'S WHICH HAVE BEEN VERY COOPERATIVE AND HAVE LIFTED THE LIEN AND ARE NOW WORKING WITH ME TO GET THE SUM OF AN EXCESS OF 400.00 IN BANK FEES REVERSED FROM MY ACCOUNT AS A RESULT OF THIS NEGLIGENCE.


BUYER BEWARE, AS THIS COMPANY IS MAKING A SIGNIFICANT CAPITAL GAIN BY WAY OF SUING ITS FORMER TENANTS. SPECIFICALLY THOSE WHO MOVE OUT WITHOUT DOING A FORMAL WALK THROUGH INSPECTION. IT IS MY FIRM BELIEF THAT THE SITUATION AS DESCRIBED IN NOT EXCLUSIVE TO MYSELF OR A FORMER CO-WORKER. I BELIEVE THAT THEIR ARE OTHERS WHO HAVE HAD THE SAME EXPERIENCE, AND MAY NOT HAVE HAD THE RESOURCES TO FIGHT THE CASE. NEVERTHELESS, I REFUSE TO ALLOW THIS EVIL TO PREVAIL.

Your thoughts? Post a response to this review. Display my response: with my username anonymously Responses appear below reviews and one response per user is permitted.

   Free estimates on moving trucks      Find apartment share/roommates