

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/dcterms/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html">
<title>Apartment Ratings | Landmark SF Ratings and Reviews</title>
<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>info@aptratings.com</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>info@aptratings.com</dc:creator>

<dc:title>Apartment Ratings | Landmark SF Ratings and Reviews</dc:title>
<dc:type>Collection</dc:type>
<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html</dc:source>
<syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
<syn:updateFrequency>4</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<dcterms:isFormatOf>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html</dcterms:isFormatOf>
<dcterms:tableOfContents>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html</dcterms:tableOfContents>

<items>
 <rdf:Seq>

	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-770154.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-618969.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-572657.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-558949.html" />


 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>


	<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html">
	<title>Landmark SF: Can&amp;#39;t complain either... (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-770154.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: I booked this apartment as a temp. place to stay while getting settled back in San Francisco -- and I was perfectly happy with it.The neighbourhood is fine -- it is at the border of the Tenderloin -- so it all depends which way you walk. If you go north ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>Landmark SF: Can&amp;#39;t complain either... (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2008-05-10T18:47:46-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-770154.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2008-05-10T18:47:46-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html">
	<title>Landmark SF: Can&amp;#39;t complain (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-618969.html</link>
	<description>
		From kinab001: We booked this apartment sight unseen before we moved to SF from England. We had already paid a $300 non-refundable deposit before we realized it was in the Tenderloin. We panicked and asked for our deposit back and they were happy to give it to us. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end&amp;#44; we ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>Landmark SF: Can&amp;#39;t complain (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-05-07T08:14:25-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-618969.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-05-07T08:14:25-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html">
	<title>Landmark SF: Shady Landlords ! (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-572657.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: First&amp;#44; we were shown a model unit that was much larger than the unit we were actually given. When I asked for a larger unit&amp;#44; I was told that I would need to give another non-refundable deposit to get another unit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is 1 cage elevator in this complex that ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>Landmark SF: Shady Landlords ! (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-01-14T16:25:55-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-572657.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-01-14T16:25:55-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF.html">
	<title>Landmark SF: not recommended (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-558949.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: shady neighborhood and unscrupulous landlord - I would go elsewhere given the choice ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>Landmark SF: not recommended (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2006-12-05T22:51:33-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CA-San-Francisco-Landmark-SF-558949.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2006-12-05T22:51:33-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

