

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/dcterms/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
<title>Apartment Ratings | 55 on the Park Ratings and Reviews</title>
<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>info@aptratings.com</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>info@aptratings.com</dc:creator>

<dc:title>Apartment Ratings | 55 on the Park Ratings and Reviews</dc:title>
<dc:type>Collection</dc:type>
<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html</dc:source>
<syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
<syn:updateFrequency>4</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<dcterms:isFormatOf>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html</dcterms:isFormatOf>
<dcterms:tableOfContents>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html</dcterms:tableOfContents>

<items>
 <rdf:Seq>

	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-972426.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-881392.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-881260.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-851945.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-694724.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-688542.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-688536.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-551739.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-420779.html" />


 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>


	<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Don&amp;#39;t bother (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-972426.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: I lived in this building for 2 years. The apartments are great. They&amp;#39;re spacious and nicely appointed. The positives end there. The walls are PAPER thing. You&amp;#39;ll hear your neighbors sneeze like they were right next to you. And since they can&amp;#39;t get any regular tenants&amp;#44; they rent out to ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Don&amp;#39;t bother (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2009-08-27T10:15:23-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-972426.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2009-08-27T10:15:23-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Good for the price... (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-881392.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: I&amp;#39;ve lived here for 8 months&amp;#44; when I was looking for places to live I came to this site and noticed a lot of bad reviews from prior years that almost turned me away. Decided to show up for an open-house and get a tour of the building and some ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Good for the price... (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2009-02-09T11:10:23-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-881392.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2009-02-09T11:10:23-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Frankly....I really like it (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-881260.html</link>
	<description>
		From mxdowtown: you always see negative stuff posted&amp;#44; so I figured...what the heck I&amp;#39;ll say something good....I haven&amp;#39;t been here very long&amp;#44; but like the previous poster&amp;#44; I figured I would give it some time before I made my final analysis.From the beginning things have been very good----the agent I worked with ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Frankly....I really like it (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2009-02-09T06:25:05-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-881260.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2009-02-09T06:25:05-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Good experience so far (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-851945.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: I am not sure why this place got so many bad reviews&amp;#44; but overall I am pretty happy with the apartment. I decided to wait 5 months before actually posting my review to give myself time to really get a feel for the place. What brought me here was the ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Good experience so far (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2008-11-17T18:44:46-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-851945.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2008-11-17T18:44:46-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: fran sucks (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-694724.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: I will echo sentiments about fran. she seriously needs to be fired as no one respects her and she has lied to everyone. To her&amp;#44; it&amp;#39;s all about the money and she will lie to you.I lived here for 3 years until i couldn&amp;#39;t take it anymore. Apts are actually ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: fran sucks (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-11-06T00:49:34-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-694724.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-11-06T00:49:34-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Horrible Staff! WARNING!!! LIARS! and all around bad apartments. (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-688542.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: The staff is horrible&amp;#44; Fran is the worst. They will sell you a bunch of lies and after you have rendered your money&amp;#44; you&amp;#39;ll soon find out that you have been duped. They are so blatant with their lies to the point that you feel violated aterwords. You really can&amp;#39;t ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Horrible Staff! WARNING!!! LIARS! and all around bad apartments. (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-10-20T00:09:33-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-688542.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-10-20T00:09:33-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Ms. Can&amp;#39;t wait to leave (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-688536.html</link>
	<description>
		From KarieParadis: This place has been a nightmare. They lied to us about the heat and hot water costs&amp;#44; among other things. The actual costs have been unbelievably high. The old windows do not open&amp;#44; therefore forcing you to use your A/C constantly and in the winter the heat goes right through ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Ms. Can&amp;#39;t wait to leave (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-10-19T23:33:25-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-688536.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-10-19T23:33:25-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: What a Relief! (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-551739.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: When I came to Hartford looking for an apartment I was so discouraged by the other buildings&amp;#44; I began to question if I needed to just buy a car and commute to the city. Lucky for me I found 55 On the Part and found nice hardwood floors and newly ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: What a Relief! (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2006-11-13T17:29:06-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-551739.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2006-11-13T17:29:06-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park.html">
	<title>55 on the Park: Bad Management (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-420779.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: Cheaply constructed&amp;#44; shortcuts everywhere&amp;#44; bad parking&amp;#44; car break ins&amp;#44; no management&amp;#44; broken promises&amp;#44; bad washer and dryers&amp;#44; management does not respond&amp;#44; expensive rent&amp;#44; walls are too thin due to lack of insulation&amp;#44; energy bills are too high doe to bad construction&amp;#44; and management staff will lie to you&amp;#44; especially Fran ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>55 on the Park: Bad Management (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2006-03-08T14:42:06-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/CT-Hartford-55-on-the-Park-420779.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2006-03-08T14:42:06-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

