



<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/dcterms/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html">
<title>Apartment Ratings | Bon Wit Plaza Ratings and Reviews</title>
<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
<dc:publisher>info@aptratings.com</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>info@aptratings.com</dc:creator>

<dc:title>Apartment Ratings | Bon Wit Plaza Ratings and Reviews</dc:title>
<dc:type>Collection</dc:type>
<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html</dc:source>
<syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
<syn:updateFrequency>4</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<dcterms:isFormatOf>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html</dcterms:isFormatOf>
<dcterms:tableOfContents>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html</dcterms:tableOfContents>

<items>
 <rdf:Seq>

	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza-659305.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza-612850.html" />


 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>


	<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html">
	<title>Bon Wit Plaza: I agree with the posting below&amp;#44; but... (Not Recommending)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza-659305.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: the current management is a disorganized mess. I do give them credit for having almost 24 hour desk coverage&amp;#44; although Gloria is the only one who knows a thing about the building and its tenants&amp;#44; not to mention that she is the only one who shows signs of consciousness. The ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>Bon Wit Plaza: I agree with the posting below&amp;#44; but... (Not Recommending)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-08-08T17:52:17-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza-659305.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-08-08T17:52:17-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza.html">
	<title>Bon Wit Plaza: Not too bad&amp;#44; but nothing exciting (Recommending!)</title>
	<link>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza-612850.html</link>
	<description>
		From -Anonymous-: A decent place&amp;#44; but nothing terribly exciting. It&amp;#39;s a condo building&amp;#44; but many of the owners rent them out. It&amp;#39;s quite old and some of the apartments have not been renovated since the 60&amp;#39;s (such as the one I lived in). When I moved in there were not three pronged ... [click to read full apartment review]
	</description>
	<dc:title>Bon Wit Plaza: Not too bad&amp;#44; but nothing exciting (Recommending!)</dc:title>
	<dc:type>text</dc:type>
	<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
	<dc:date>2007-04-22T23:50:44-06:00</dc:date>
	<dc:rights>Copyright 2005, ApartmentRatings.com, a division of Internet Brands, Inc.</dc:rights>
	<dc:source>http://www.apartmentratings.com/rate/DC-Washington-Bon-Wit-Plaza-612850.html</dc:source>
	<dcterms:issued>2007-04-22T23:50:44-06:00</dcterms:issued>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

